Timeframes Colliding
- Posted by Derek
- on March 22nd, 2011
After starting last week controlling risk and ending the week embracing it, I’ve been mostly inactive since exiting remaining trading longs Friday morning. I had no idea what to expect for Monday, and my plan showed a lack of clarity. My planning is clear today, but still not quite ready for action. Instinct tells me we’re about to see the end of this (impressive) bounce from the lows, but that’s a crowded idea and until I have some evidence that the rally is being rejected I’m sitting still. As Zortrades said last week, no shorting for 3-5 days after a low…I follow the same rule.
The source of my confusion is a conflict between the short and intermediate time frame. Both the indices and my breadth stats peaked, weakened, and continue to point to lower prices over coming weeks. However, there has been no evidence of selling pressure in the past few days. This conflict tells me to wait. Buying panics for long trades in Sectors ETFs like $XLE and $FAS was fine last week, but now with mild conditions I have no play other than to let the short-term exhaust itself and the intermediate term to regain control.
Why care about the long-term? Well, I believe the purpose of my intermediate and long term work is to tell me whether the bull or bear side is more likely to result in a tail event. And without capturing a big tail now and then, I’m simply spinning my wheels to capture enough pennies to overcome transactions costs. I need some winners, and big ones at that. I don’t care if it’s 1 in 4…my results will be determined by my biggest winners and losers, so I like the tailwind of longer timeframes to increase my expectancy.
Why worry about the short-term? If I’m going to stick around long enough to catch a big move, it helps to get off to a good start. Both financially and emotionally, the closer I get to the actual “perfect” point of entry the more likely I am to be calm, cool, and collected; in other words, patient and disciplined holding a winner. Seeking perfection is absurd, but that’s no excuse for sloppy entry.
With unanimous bearish stats in my longer-term work, and unanimous bullish stats in my shorter-term work, it’s best I sit and wait. It would take a whole lot more to reverse the longer-term structure(obviously), so I’m now in a detached stalking stage waiting for a sign that some major stocks are able to sell off for more than 30 minutes. Ripples of selling will come in before any major waves take charge, so I’m stalking my Leaders List for early signs of shifting energy. If that evidence comes, I’ll dig deep into my scans to see which stocks look ripest for the next break.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
blog comments powered by Disqus-
Derek Hernquist is a Portfolio Manager at D. Scott Neal, Inc. where he focuses exclusively on implementing an ETF-based Tactical Asset Allocation program for the firm’s investment clients. He studies price action across multiple time frames in search of sectors and More »
-
Recent Posts
-
Archives
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
-